Final night, I used to be watching, for the tenth time, the award profitable musical, “Singing in the Rain,” which starred the late Gene Kelly and Donald O’Connor, and the eighty-year previous Debbie Reynolds. The 1952 movement image was nominated for two Oscars, gained the 1953 Golden Globe, and three different main awards. I truly assume it ought to have gained a number of 1953 Oscars for its immaculate, if not good, dancing choreography, comedy, and drama. I imply, in comparison with the expertise and precision demonstrated over a decade later by Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer, within the 1965 musical “The Sound of Music,” which I feel was significantly lower than that demonstrated by Kelly, Reynolds, and O’Connor, “Singing in the Rain” ought to have gained at the least 2 Oscars. The 2 movement image musicals have been, in fact, totally different in fashion, size, and the expertise of the actors; however one cannot fail to spot probably the most vital distinction between the 2 productions. It was the utterly flawless mixed impact of dancing, singing, and comedic and dramatic appearing, which was completed by the dancers, actors, and studio employees, of “Singing in the Rain,” whereas there have been fairly a couple of “unmentioned” choreographic errors in “The Sound of Music.” The movement image professionals, who created “Singing in the Rain,” labored collectively tirelessly to make an unequaled musical production. Moreover, one can rely on the fingers of 1 hand the variety of American musicals produced since 1952 with the identical pure flawless dancing, singing, and appearing from the starring casts. So, the query lingers and calls for a solution as to why “Singing in the Rain” hasn’t been remade in a contemporary setting, with totally different actors, like so many different remakes of the basic films?
You need to use all the fancy 21st Century pc gadgetry and superior sound gear that cash can purchase to aim to synthetically reproduce the real dancing, singing, and appearing of Gene Kelly, Debbie Reynolds, and Donald O’Connor; however one unassailable reality stays finally true. It might be an costly, however finally failed, try in synthetic movie-making. It is unimaginable to persuasively simulate pure human expertise with computer systems. Additional, it is very unbelievable that three versatile entertainers, like Gene Kelly, Debbie Reynolds, and Donald O’Connor, can be discovered amongst all of the completed dancers and singers within the present 21st Century world, to duplicate what these three distinctive individuals did. And that is a crying disgrace. These three stars might act, sing, and dance in a wonderful combining trend, one thing that no present stage, or movement image, star can remotely do at the moment. Take Robin Williams as an example. He is an exquisite actor and comic, however he cannot dance or sing like Gene Kelly or Donald O’Connor. Matt Damon, Tim Robbins, Tom Hanks, Ben Affleck, Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Meg Ryan, Russell Crowe, Richard Gere, and Julia Roberts, and lots of different late-20th Century Oscar winners, are all genuinely nice actors, and have made their hundreds of thousands. However none of them can come near combining appearing, singing, and dancing in the best way the “Singing in the Rain” forged did so completely. Some film producers assume that these foregoing top-rated actors and actresses might persuade theatre and tv audiences that they really possess such expertise, which they do not actually possess, via using pc enhancements. I do not assume so. Using such technical fakery can be very evident.
There’s additionally one more reason why I feel a real remake of “Singing in the Rain” has not been produced. Individuals right now simply do not wish to work as onerous because the actors and actresses did within the 1930s, 40s, and 50s in an effort to produce pure inventive excellence. They’re now eagerly prepared to accept much less to get their paychecks. For instance, in September of 1990, when residing in Carlsbad, Florida, I used to be, one late night, discussing singing expertise with the sound supervisor for Madonna, who was returning to LA from a live performance on the Ft Lauderdale Conference Middle. He had stopped for some refreshments on the Carlsbad 7-Eleven, the place I used to be the night time retailer supervisor. The guy seemed to be utterly sober as he, very candidly, talked about Madonna and her expertise. “It’s all in the sound equipment,” he stated. “Madonna doesn’t have lot of singing talent, but she has a great sound manager and the best equipment.” Then he laughed and added. “With the right computer sound equipment, any normal person’s singing voice can be made to sound professional. That’s how Sissy Spacek sounded like Loretta Lynn in “Coal Miner’s Daughter.” The rationale I keep in mind his phrases verbatim, is as a result of I wrote them down instantly after he left the shop. Furthermore, the dramatic plot in “Singing in the Rain” was all about what occurred when an actress with out singing expertise was made to look, and sound, like she had that potential, on the expense of a naturally gifted singer. I feel that the ethical of the film was, merely, that actresses and actors with out sure skills shouldn’t be made to falsely seem to audiences to have such skills. Maybe, nevertheless, the film business in Tinsel City was sadly shifting in that less-desirable path when the 1953 Oscars have been awarded. Maybe that is why an ideal musical was not given its due that yr.
I used to be born in 1951, and first noticed “Singing in the Rain” in 1969. That was partly as a result of my mother and father weren’t, in any respect, movie-goers; and, additionally, partly due to my very own working priorities throughout my teenage years. I learn my first commentary concerning the musical shortly after I noticed it, and recall how the forged had practiced regularly, day and night time, to realize choreographic perfection, to level of blistered and bleeding ft. Eighteen years after the musical premiered, I had presumed that the exhausting work related to American achievement within the dancing, singing, and appearing required for award-winning musicals was an indelible commonplace. You recognize, in affiliation with the previous American adage, “what’s exhausting we do instantly; what’s unimaginable simply takes a bit longer.” Well, I don’t want to believe that there aren’t any more multi-talented actors and actresses out there, who can superbly sing, dance, and act like Gene Kelly, Debbie Reynolds, and Donald O’Connor. What’s more, I don’t want to believe that great dancers, singers, and actors can only appear today as products of institutions like Julliard, or as certified prodigies. Gene Kelly, Debbie Reynolds, and Donald O’Connor were not prodigies. They were normal human beings who became great by continually working hard to improve and perfect their artistic talents. And they so perfectly did that in “Singing within the Rain.”
Want video production services? Click on Right here Video Production Services